Does in situ replacement of a staphylococcal infected vascular graft with a rifampicin impregnated gelatin sealed Dacron graft reduce the incidence of subsequent infection?

Citation
M. Vicaretti et al., Does in situ replacement of a staphylococcal infected vascular graft with a rifampicin impregnated gelatin sealed Dacron graft reduce the incidence of subsequent infection?, INT ANGIOL, 18(3), 1999, pp. 225-232
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY
ISSN journal
03929590 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
225 - 232
Database
ISI
SICI code
0392-9590(199909)18:3<225:DISROA>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Background. The aim of this study was to treat methicillin-resistant Staphy lococcus aureus (MRSA) or S. epidermidis prosthetic vascular graft infectio ns by in situ replacement with a rifampicin bonded Gelsoft graft. Methods. Interposition grafts were placed in the internal carotid artery of 56 merino sheep and the graft surface directly inoculated with 10(8) colon y forming units (CFU) of MRSA (29) or S. epidermidis (27). At three weeks, grafts were harvested and sheep allocated to three groups. In the MRSA infe cted group, sheep received grafts soaked in 1.2 mg/ml (12), 10 mg/ml (10) a nd no (7) rifampicin. For S. epidermidis, sheep received grafts soaked in 1 .2 mg/ml (10), 10 mg/ml (9) and no (8) rifampicin. There were two deaths, i n the MRSA study group, one each from the rifampicin treated groups. The re maining sheep were euthanased and grafts harvested three weeks following re grafting. Grafts at harvests were assessed for perigraft abscess formation, anastomotic disruption and graft thrombosis. Swabs were taken to assess ba cterial growth in the perigraft tissues, and external and internal graft su rfaces. A 3-5 mm segment of graft was incubated in a broth medium. For S. e pidermidis the remainder of the graft was ground and then incubated in a br oth medium. Results. For MRSA, no statistical difference between the groups was reached for any of the measured parameters. For S. epidermidis, a significant redu ction was reached for total infected specimens in the 10 mg/ml group compar ed to both control (p<0.001) and 1.2 mg/ml (p<0.005) groups. Graft reinfect ion was also less likely to occur with S. epidermidis than MRSA. Conclusions. In conclusion, replacement of S. epidermidis infected vascular grafts with 10 mg/ml rifampicin soaked Gelsoft graft is effective in reduc ing subsequent S. epidermidis infection. This conclusion cannot be extended to MRSA infected vascular grafts.