A comparison of three strategies for risk-adjustment of outcomes for AIDS patients hospitalized for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia

Citation
S. Bakken et al., A comparison of three strategies for risk-adjustment of outcomes for AIDS patients hospitalized for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, J ADV NURS, 30(6), 1999, pp. 1424-1431
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
ISSN journal
03092402 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1424 - 1431
Database
ISI
SICI code
0309-2402(199912)30:6<1424:ACOTSF>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Background: The need for risk-adjustment of patient outcomes has been drive n by the competitive health care market and the subsequent increase in comp arative outcome reporting among health care institutions, among managed car e plans, and among individual providers for some procedures (e.g. coronary artery bypass graft surgery). However, if the outcomes reported do not take into account patient characteristics that can be considered dimensions of risk for poor clinical outcomes or increased utilization of services, there is the possibility that inaccurate conclusions will be drawn about the qua lity of care provided. Objective: The specific purpose of this study was to examine the ability of four measures, APACHE III - acute physiology scale, Quality Audit Marker - ambulation score, Quality Audit Marker - self-care ability score, and Nursing Severity Index, to predict mortality and hospita l length of stay in a convenience sample of 140 males with Pneumocystis car inii pneumonia. Methods: The study utilized a descriptive, longitudinal des ign. Results: APACHE III - acute physiology scale (P = 0.006, odds ratio = 1.40), and Quality Audit Marker - ambulation (P = 0.037, odds ratio = 0.50) , were significant predictors of hospital mortality and the APACHE III - ac ute physiology scale was also a predictor of mortality within 3 (P = 0.004, odds ratio = 1.13) and 6 months (P = 0.009, odds ratio = 1.10) following h ospitalization. Only Quality Audit Marker - ambulation (P = 0.0001) was a s ignificant predictor of length of stay. Conclusions: The findings of this s tudy confirm the findings of other investigators that measures of acute cli nical stability and functional status have utility as risk-adjustment appro aches for the outcomes of mortality and length of stay. Further research is needed that compares the utility of generic vs. disease-specific measures for prediction of outcomes in HIV/AIDS.