In this paper we test a particular form of interdependent behaviour, namely
the hypothesis that individuals' choices of hours of work are influenced b
y the average hours of work in a social reference group. There are problems
in empirically disentangling the effects of interdependent behaviour and p
reference variation across groups. We show that panel data or data from sev
eral points in time are needed, In the empirical analysis we combine cross-
section data from 1973, 1980, and 1990. Our results support the hypothesis
of interdependent behaviour. The implication is that conventional tax polic
y predictions, in which preference interdependencies are neglected, will te
nd to underestimate the effect of a tax reform on hours of work. Our point
estimates suggest that conventional calculations would capture only about a
third of the actual change in hours of work. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley
& Sons, Ltd.