Comparison of parametric and nonparametric methods for the analysis and inversion of immittance data: Critique of earlier work

Authors
Citation
Jr. Macdonald, Comparison of parametric and nonparametric methods for the analysis and inversion of immittance data: Critique of earlier work, J COMPUT PH, 157(1), 2000, pp. 280-301
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Physics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
ISSN journal
00219991 → ACNP
Volume
157
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
280 - 301
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9991(20000101)157:1<280:COPANM>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Recently, two methods for the estimation of discrete and/or continuous dist ributions of relaxation times from small-signal electrical frequency-respon se data have been compared. For discrete-line distributions, the parametric method used was found to be inferior in some ways to the nonparametric one , which involved Tikhonov regularization, and it was concluded that the par ametric one could not be employed to estimate continuous distributions at a ll. Here it is shown by Monte Carlo simulation that both conclusions are in correct. The same data situations analyzed in the earlier work were reanaly zed using a complex nonlinear least-squares parametric method that has been employed to estimate discrete-line distributions since 1982 and continuous ones since 1993. Quite different results from those presented earlier were obtained, and the original parametric method was shown to be far superior to the nonparametric one for the estimation of discrete-line distributions, since inversion is unnecessary and resolution is far greater. For continuo us or mixed distribution inversions, the parametric method was again superi or, and it allows unambiguous distinction between discrete-line points and those associated with a continuous distribution, while the nonparametric in version method does not allow such distinction and approximates all distrib utional points as continuous-distribution ones. The parametric method used and described here is also valuable for other data analysis tasks other tha n those involving inversion. Some of its error characteristics are investig ated herein, and the importance of matching the weighting error-model to th e form of the errors in the data is illustrated. It was found that with nor mally distributed random errors added to exact data, the distributions of e stimated parameters were not normal but were closer to normal for proportio nal errors than for additive ones. (C) 2000 Academic Press.