Methods for calculating factors of safety for plant stems

Citation
Kj. Niklas et Hc. Spatz, Methods for calculating factors of safety for plant stems, J EXP BIOL, 202(23), 1999, pp. 3273-3280
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Biology,"Experimental Biology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00220949 → ACNP
Volume
202
Issue
23
Year of publication
1999
Pages
3273 - 3280
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0949(199912)202:23<3273:MFCFOS>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
The concept of a 'factor of safety' is used by biologists and engineers who generally agree that structures must be mechanically reliable, i.e. that s tructures must be capable of coping with unprecedented loads without failin g. These factors can be calculated for individual structures or for a popul ation of otherwise equivalent mechanical structures differing in their load capabilities. Objective methods for quantifying factors of safety for biol ogical structures are nevertheless difficult to devise because (1) actual ( working) loads are defined by environmental conditions that can vary widely , (2) breaking loads (capability) of otherwise mechanically equivalent stru ctures can likewise vary as a result of developmental variation, and (3) sp ecific criteria for failure must be determined a priori. In this paper, we illustrate and discuss two methods for computing factors of safety for plants. One method works well for individual stems or entire plants, the other is useful when dealing with a population of conspecifics exhibiting a norm of reaction. Both methods require estimates of the actual and breaking bending (or torsional) moments experienced by stems, and both are amenable to dealing with any biologically reasonable criterion for fai lure. However, the two methods differ in terms of the assumptions made and the types of data that need to be gathered. The advantage of the first meth od is that it estimates the potential for survival of an individual stem or plant. The disadvantage is that it neglects natural variation among otherw ise mechanically homologous individuals. The advantage of the second (stati stical) approach is that it estimates the probability of survival of a popu lation in a particular habitat. The disadvantage of this approach is that i t sheds little light on the probability of an individual's survival.