The concept of a 'factor of safety' is used by biologists and engineers who
generally agree that structures must be mechanically reliable, i.e. that s
tructures must be capable of coping with unprecedented loads without failin
g. These factors can be calculated for individual structures or for a popul
ation of otherwise equivalent mechanical structures differing in their load
capabilities. Objective methods for quantifying factors of safety for biol
ogical structures are nevertheless difficult to devise because (1) actual (
working) loads are defined by environmental conditions that can vary widely
, (2) breaking loads (capability) of otherwise mechanically equivalent stru
ctures can likewise vary as a result of developmental variation, and (3) sp
ecific criteria for failure must be determined a priori.
In this paper, we illustrate and discuss two methods for computing factors
of safety for plants. One method works well for individual stems or entire
plants, the other is useful when dealing with a population of conspecifics
exhibiting a norm of reaction. Both methods require estimates of the actual
and breaking bending (or torsional) moments experienced by stems, and both
are amenable to dealing with any biologically reasonable criterion for fai
lure. However, the two methods differ in terms of the assumptions made and
the types of data that need to be gathered. The advantage of the first meth
od is that it estimates the potential for survival of an individual stem or
plant. The disadvantage is that it neglects natural variation among otherw
ise mechanically homologous individuals. The advantage of the second (stati
stical) approach is that it estimates the probability of survival of a popu
lation in a particular habitat. The disadvantage of this approach is that i
t sheds little light on the probability of an individual's survival.