Comparisons between buoy-observed, satellite-derived, and modeled surface shortwave flux over the subtropical North Atlantic during the Subduction Experiment
De. Waliser et al., Comparisons between buoy-observed, satellite-derived, and modeled surface shortwave flux over the subtropical North Atlantic during the Subduction Experiment, J GEO RES-A, 104(D24), 1999, pp. 31301-31320
Two years of surface shortwave flux data, from five buoys in the subtropica
l North Atlantic Ocean during the Subduction Experiment, were used to exami
ne shortwave absorption in the atmosphere, and its partitioning between the
clear and cloudy sky. Robust methods were used to isolate the clear-sky sh
ortwave observations so that they could be directly compared to values deri
ved using a single-column version of the National Center for Atmospheric Re
search Community Climate Model radiation code. The model-derived values agr
eed with the observations to within 0.5% mean relative error. Additional an
alysis showed that the model-data clear-sky surface shortwave differences s
howed no systematic relationship with respect to column water vapor amount.
These results indicate that clear-sky absorption of shortwave radiation ap
pears to be well modeled by current theory. Model-derived clear-sky surface
shortwave values were combined with the observed (all-sky) values to deter
mine the surface shortwave cloud forcing. The mean of these series were com
bined with 5-year mean Earth Radiation Budget Experiment derived top of the
atmosphere (TOA) cloud forcing values to estimate the surface to TOA cloud
forcing ratio. The resulting values range between 1.25 and 1.59. These val
ues, along with the agreement between modeled and observed clear-sky surfac
e shortwave, support the suggestion that our current theoretical radiative
transfer models do not properly account for the amount of shortwave energy
absorbed by the cloudy atmosphere. Mean values from the 2-year shortwave fl
ux time series were compared to mean values from two climatologies derived
from bulk parameterizations that utilize ship-based cloud reports. These co
mparisons show that the Oberhuber climatology underestimates the surface sh
ortwave flux by similar to 20% (similar to 40 W m(-2)), while the Esbensen
and Kushnir climatology underestimates the flux by similar to 4% (similar t
o 8 W m(-2)). The observed mean values were also compared to five satellite
-derived climatologies. These comparisons showed much better and more consi
stent agreement, with relative bias errors ranging from about -1 to 69%. Co
mparisons to contemporaneous, daily-average satellite derived values show r
elatively good agreement as well, with relative biases of the order of 2% (
similar to 3-9 W m(-2)) and root-mean-square differences of similar to 10%
(25-30 W m(-2)). Aspects of the role aerosols play in the above results are
discussed along with the implications of the above results on the integrit
y of open-ocean buoy measurements of surface shortwave flux and the possibi
lity of using the techniques developed in this study to remotely monitor th
e operating condition of buoy-based shortwave radiometers.