Characteristics of motor vehicle crashes of drivers with dementia of the Alzheimer type

Citation
Db. Carr et al., Characteristics of motor vehicle crashes of drivers with dementia of the Alzheimer type, J AM GER SO, 48(1), 2000, pp. 18-22
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
ISSN journal
00028614 → ACNP
Volume
48
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
18 - 22
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8614(200001)48:1<18:COMVCO>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a difference in crash rates and ch aracteristics between drivers with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) and nondemented older persons who were controls. DESIGN: A pilot study using a 5-year retrospective analysis of stare-record ed crash data and crash characteristics followed by patient enrollment into a study on road test skills. SETTING: Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at Washington University in St . Louis, Missouri. Subjects were enrolled as volunteers in a longitudinal s tudy of aging and DAT. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-one subjects (58 nondemented, older driver s and 63 drivers with DAT) with a mean age of 77 years met the inclusion cr iteria for this study. DAT was diagnosed using validated clinical diagnosti c criteria and was staged by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale. All subjects with DAT were in the very mild (CDR = 0.5) or mild (CDR = 1) stage s. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: State-recorded traffic crashes. Also, a daily driving diary was completed by each subject and used to estimate miles traveled pe r year. RESULTS: Subjects diagnosed with mild DAT (CDR = 1) reported less r oadway exposure (average number of miles driven per year) than did drivers with very mild DAT (CDR = 0.5) or controls. Crashes in both groups were inf requent, with 0.07 state-recorded crashes per driver per year in the nondem ented group (CDR = 0), 0.06 in the very mild DAT group (CDR = 0.5), and 0.0 4 in the mild DAT group (CDR = 1). There was no statistical difference in t he crash frequency between groups, even when adjusting for expo sure. Drive rs with DAT had trends toward more at-fault crashes, crashes with injuries, and crashes in which the officer on the scene cited failure to yield. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample, individuals with very mild or mild DAT who cont inued to drive seemed to have crash rates similar to those of the controls. There may be significant differences between the causes and the consequenc es of crashes involving drivers with DAT when compared with cognitively int act age-marched controls, but none were found in this pilot study. Further research on crash characteristics is needed in larger samples of community- based drivers with DAT across wider ranges of dementia severity to address issues such as driving competency and public safety.