In 1997, doctors in England received official guidelines on the use of stat
ins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitors) for primary and seco
ndary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD). Six months later we deter
mined the status of patients who had been discharged from a specialist lipi
d clinic in 1989. 195 patients received questionnaires, with the consent of
their general practitioners, regarding morbidity in the subsequent decade
and present medication, and were asked to have their cholesterol checked. A
nalysis was confined to the 86 with a current cholesterol measurement.
Of 61 patients who had been discharged on a regimen of dietary advice and/o
r medication for primary prevention of CHD, 8 had been changed to a statin
and 6 had been started on one. According to the new guidelines, none of the
se qualified for treatment. Of 25 patients who had been discharged on drugs
for secondary prevention, all qualified for a statin but only 14 were rece
iving one--in 6 cases without achieving the recommended reductions in chole
sterol.
In many of the patients reviewed, treatment had not been altered to conform
with the new guidelines. If hyperlipidaemic patients are to benefit prompt
ly from advances in treatment, one solution might be a central registry tha
t arranged regular tests and reported back to general practitioners. Howeve
r, since many patients at risk do not have very high cholesterol levels, a
coordinated approach to CHD risk factors would be preferable.