Inhibitory effect of mibefradil on contractions induced by sympathetic neurotransmitter release in the rat tail artery

Citation
R. Van Der Lee et al., Inhibitory effect of mibefradil on contractions induced by sympathetic neurotransmitter release in the rat tail artery, N-S ARCH PH, 361(1), 2000, pp. 74-79
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
00281298 → ACNP
Volume
361
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
74 - 79
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-1298(200001)361:1<74:IEOMOC>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
This study tested whether mibefradil exerts a stronger inhibitory effect th an verapamil on sympathetic neurotransmitter release provoked by electrical field stimulation. Tail arteries (diameter 620+/-9 mu m) were obtained fro m male Wistar rats. Ring segments of 2 mm length were mounted in an isometr ic wire myograph. After an appropriate period of equilibration and a primin g procedure the vessels were either subjected to electrical field stimulati on (EFS; frequency 0.25-4 Hz fdr 30 s) or a concentration-response curve wa s generated with either noradrenaline (concentration range 0.03-3 mu M) or ATP (concentration 0.3 mM) which served as baseline parameters. EFS-induced contractions were stable and reproducible and were blocked by tetrodotoxin (1 mu M), guanethidine (3 mu M), and the combination of suramin (0.5 mM) a nd prazosin (3 mu M). EFS-induced contractions (1 Wt) were almost completel y inhibited by 10 mu M mibefradil (97%) but only partly by 10 mu M verapami l (73%). Log ICS, values were -5.6 for mibefradil and -6.6 for verapamil. C alcium antagonists were equipotent in inhibiting noradrenaline (maximum inh ibition by mibefradil and verapamil by 70% and 75%, respectively; log IC50: -6.5 and -6.7, respectively) and ATP-mediated contractions (maximum in; hi bition by mibefradil and verapamil by 92% and 97%; respectively; log IC50: -6.5 and -7.0, respectively). Consequently mibefradil displays an additiona l effect on con; tractions provoked by EFS-induced sympathetic noradrenalin e release which cannot be explained by L-type calcium channel blockade. Pro bably this effect of mibefradil is mediated by the blockade of prejunctiona l N-type calcium channels, thereby inhibiting sympathetic noradrenaline rel ease. Since activation of the sympathetic nervous system in hypertension is both common and undesirable, a calcium antagonist displaying both L- and N -type calcium channel blocking activities, would have major advantages over calcium antagonists lacking N-type calcium channel blocking activities.