J. Antinheimo et al., Population-based analysis of sporadic and type 2 neurofibromatosis-associated meningiomas and schwannomas, NEUROLOGY, 54(1), 2000, pp. 71-76
Objective: To estimate the incidence of meningiomatosis and schwannomatosis
, and their familial occurrences and relation to type 2 neurofibromatosis (
NF2) in a well-defined population. Methods: Patients with histologically ve
rified intracranial, spinal, or peripheral schwannomas or meningiomas, who
were residents of the Helsinki University Hospital catchment area (populati
on, 1,713,000) from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1995, were included in
the study. The Population Register Center was used to identify relatives o
f all the patients, and their data were linked further to the Finnish Cance
r Registry to find NF2-related tumors. Detailed pedigrees were constructed
for the patients with NF2, schwannomatosis, meningiomatosis, patients with
relatives with histologically verified schwannomas or meningiomas, and pati
ents younger than 25 years of age at the time of diagnosis. Results: Approx
imately 3% (12 of 455) of the schwannoma patients had multiple schwannomas
in association with NF2, and 2% (11 of 455) had schwannomatosis without NF2
. Two of the patients with schwannomatosis (2 of 11) had familial schwannom
atosis. Approximately 1% (7 of 823) of the patients with meningioma had mul
tiple meningiomas in association with NF2, and 4% (29 of 823) had meningiom
atosis without NF2. No families with meningiomatosis were found among the 8
23 patients with meningioma studied. The birth occurrence of NF2 was 1 in 8
7,410. Conclusions: The current diagnostic criteria of type 2 neurofibromat
osis (NF2) seem valid because NF2 patients were differentiated rather easil
y from patients with sporadic schwannomatosis and meningiomatosis. Familial
meningiomatosis, if it truly exists, is very rare, and familial schwannoma
tosis is un common.