Objective: The purpose of this study is to introduce and evaluate a new con
cept in astigmatic keratotomy (AK) named full-arc, depth-dependent AK (FDAK
).
Design: Noncomparative interventional case series.
Participants: FDAK was performed on a total of 37 eyes with regular astigma
tism; of these, 16 eyes received FDAK alone, and 21 eyes received FDAK comb
ined with cataract surgery.
Methods: Corneal topography was used to divide the cornea into two discreet
regions of "steep" and "flat." Then, paired arcuate incisions, 90 degrees
in length, were placed along the full are of the steep area. The level of a
stigmatic correction was controlled by varying the incision depth from 40%
to 80% on the basis of a provisional nomogram developed by the authors.
Main Outcome Measures: Keratometries, corneal topographies, and visual acui
ties were measured.
Results: The FDAK alone group showed a significant improvement from a preop
erative corneal astigmatism of 2.90 +/- 0.78 diopters (D) to a postoperativ
e value of 0.89 +/- 0.52 D. The "combined" group also showed significant im
provement from a preoperative corneal astigmatism of 2.97 +/- 1.01 D, to a
postoperative value of 1.02 +/- 0.45 D. The deviation of achieved. Correcti
on from attempted correction using vector analysis was between 1.37 D of un
dercorrection and 0.98 D of overcorrection, with 91.9% of cases within the
range of +/-1.0 D. Slight oblique change caused by axis deviation was obser
ved in seven cases. Both uncorrected and corrected visual acuity showed sta
tistically significant improvement. No serious complications were encounter
ed.
Conclusions: Controlling the level of correction by varying the incision de
pth allowed the surgeon to use long incisions (90 degrees in length in regu
lar astigmatism) covering the entire steep area, minimizing the undesirable
changes induced by conventional deep and narrow incision AK and resulting
in an ideal corneal sphericity after surgery. FDAK enabled the surgeon to a
ccurately control the level of astigmatic correction with minimal risk of c
orneal perforation. Ophthalmology 2000;107:95-104 (C) 2000 by the American
Academy of Ophthalmology.