Sp. Morgan et al., White and nonwhite trends in first birth timing: Comparisons using vital registration and current population surveys, POP RES POL, 18(4), 1999, pp. 339-356
The magnitude of racial differences in first birth timing vary greatly depe
nding upon the data sources from which they are estimated. Vital registrati
on data (Heuser 1976; with updates from the National Center for Health Stat
istics 1974-1990) show that in recent years nonwhites have higher risks of
a first birth at virtually all ages compared to whites. As a result very la
rge and historically novel differentials in childlessness are forecast usin
g these data (see Rindfuss et al. 1988; Chen & Morgan 1991; Morgan & Chen 1
992). However, retrospective fertility history data collected from the 1980
, 1985 and 1990 Current Population Surveys (CPS) suggest much smaller racia
l differences in completed childlessness and isolate racial differences in
probabilities of first births at young ages. Differences also exist between
theses two series for whites prior to the mid-1960s but not afterwards. Re
asons for these differing estimates are suggested and examined. We conclude
that a substantial portion of the differences result from an accumulation
of biases in the vital registration estimates that affect primarily estimat
es of first birth timing. Thus, the CPS data provide a more firm basis for
racial comparisons of first birth timing.