A double-blind, randomised, parallel study comparing intravenous dolasetron plus dexamethasone and intravenous dolasetron alone for the management offractionated cisplatin-related nausea and vomiting
Aa. Fauser et al., A double-blind, randomised, parallel study comparing intravenous dolasetron plus dexamethasone and intravenous dolasetron alone for the management offractionated cisplatin-related nausea and vomiting, SUPP CARE C, 8(1), 2000, pp. 49-54
Fractionated cisplatin-containing regimens are routinely used for chemother
apy in certain types of cancer. Dolasetron has been shown to be effective i
n preventing acute emesis related to high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy over
24 h; its effectiveness has not been evaluated in fractionated cisplatin-co
ntaining chemotherapy, This trial was designed to assess the efficacy of do
lasetron alone or dolasetron plus dexamethasone in preventing nausea and vo
miting related to fractionated cisplatin chemotherapy, The patients were 21
0 cancer in-patients, who were randomised to receive 100 mg dolasetron i.v.
or 100 mg dolasetron i.v. plus 20 mg dexamethasone before chemotherapy pri
marily with cisplatin (15-50 mg/m(2)) infused over less than or equal to 4h
for at least 2 but not more than 5 consecutive days, Dolasetron was admini
stered to all patients 30 min before cisplatin, Dexamethasone was administe
red in double-blind fashion 5 min before cisplatin. Efficacy was measured a
t hour 24 of each study day using complete response (no vomiting and no res
cue medication) and maximum severity of nausea, self-assessed by patients u
sing a 100mm visual analogue scale. Most (198) of the patients completed th
e study and were evaluable. Overall complete response rates were significan
tly higher in the dolasetron plus dexamethasone group than in the dolasetro
n only group (72.9% vs 40.8%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Complete response
rates on each study day were also significantly higher with dolasetron plus
dexamethasone than with dolasetron alone (P < 0.029), with an attenuated e
fficacy in the delayed phase in both groups. Chi-square test and logistic r
egression applied to daily response rates indicated a significant influence
of treatment (day 1: P=0.0002, day 2: P < 0.0001, day 3: P = 0.0007, day 4
: P = 0.0007, day 5: P = 0.029). Treatment and duration of chemotherapy exe
rted the only statistically significant subgroup effects on complete respon
se (P < 0.0001), Both treatments were administered safely. As seen with oth
er 5-HT3 receptor antagonist antiemetics, the addition of dexamethasone to
dolasetron significantly increases effectiveness in preventing nausea and v
omiting related to fractionated cisplatin chemotherapy. Both dolasetron and
dolasetron plus dexamethasone were well tolerated.