The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery - An experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope
P. Van Bergen et al., The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery - An experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope, SURG ENDOSC, 14(1), 2000, pp. 71-74
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Background: In 1995, when we first used a high-definition television (HDTV)
video system during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Tuebingen, we were s
urprised by the excellence of the spatial impression achieved by an image w
ith improved resolution. Although any improvement in vision systems entails
a trade-off among cost, quality, and complexity, high-definition imaging m
ay well become an essential part of 3-D video systems. The aim of this expe
rimental study was to assess the impact of high definition on surgical task
efficiency in minimally invasive surgery and to determine whether it is pr
eferable to use a 3-D system or a 2-D system with perfect resolution and co
lor-for instance, HDTV or the three-chip charge-coupled device (3CCD).
Methods: We compared a 3-D video system with the vision through a stereosco
pic rectoscope for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Because its ste
reoscopic direct vision is not restricted to either shutter technology or v
ideo resolution, TEM optics represents the state of the art. For objective
comparison, inanimate phantom models with suturing tasks were set up. The s
etups allowed the approach of parallel instruments as in TEM operations or
via a laparoscopic-approach, with oblique instruments coming laterally. Bot
h types of procedure were carried out by highly experienced laparoscopic su
rgeons as well as those inexperienced in endoscopic surgery. These voluntee
rs worked under 3-D video vision and/or TEM vision. Altogether, the model t
asks were performed by 54 different persons.
Results: The evaluation did not show a significant (p > 0.05) difference in
performance time in all models, but there was a clear trend showing the be
nefit of a higher resolution.
Conclusion: We found a tendency for both endoscopically inexperienced and e
xperienced surgeons to benefit from the use of a system with improved resol
ution (direct vision) rather than a 3-D shutter video system.