Prevalence of local risk factors in patients with advanced hip and knee osteoarthritis in the UIm osteoarthritis study. Aim of study

Citation
Kp. Gunther et al., Prevalence of local risk factors in patients with advanced hip and knee osteoarthritis in the UIm osteoarthritis study. Aim of study, Z ORTHOP GR, 137(6), 1999, pp. 468-473
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE
ISSN journal
00443220 → ACNP
Volume
137
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
468 - 473
Database
ISI
SICI code
0044-3220(199911/12)137:6<468:POLRFI>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Aim of study: To determine the prevalence of joint specific risk factors in patients with different patterns of advanced hip and knee osteoarthritis ( OA). Methods: We performed a cross-sectional multicenter study in four orth opaedic hospitals in the southwest of Germany. A detailed medical history ( date and nature of trauma, conservative and surgical treatment of congenita l or acquired joint disorders known as secondary causes of OA) and radiogra phic evaluation (sequelae of hip dysplasia, slipped capital femoral epiphys is or other malformations) was obtained in 809 patients with advanced hip ( n = 420) or knee (n = 389) osteoarthritis, which required unilateral total joint replacement. According to the presence or absence of joint specific r isk factors, patients were classified as having secondary or primary (idiop athic) OA. Results: In 41.7% (25.5%) of patients with hip OA and 33.4% (11. 1%) of patients with knee OA some predisposing abnormality of the operated (or contralateral) joint could be observed. In hip OA the underlying pathol ogical conditions were, mainly hip dysplasia (25.0% in the operated joint a nd 14.8% in the non-operated joint) and slipped capital femoral epiphysis ( 7.1% and 14.8%), while knee OA was most often associated with a history of severe trauma (28.6% and 8.3%) Conclusion: While there is a lack of compara ble investigations in patients with advanced knee OA, the presented data is somewhat contradictory to earlier reports of the prevalence of identified underlying risk factors in patients with hip OA. The reported differences, however, might be attributed to different methodological approaches and cou ld also resemble recent changes in the multifactorial ethiopathologic conce pt of OA.