I. Garcia-bolao et E. Alegria, Implantation of 500 consecutive cardiac pacemakers in the electrophysiology laboratory, ACT CARDIOL, 54(6), 1999, pp. 339-343
Objective - The purpose of this study was to examine the practice of cardia
c bradycardia pacing in an electrophysiology laboratory and to evaluate the
safety and efficacy of pacemaker implantation by cardiologists in this set
ting.
Methods and results - We evaluated a consecutive series of the first 500 pe
rmanent pacemakers (mean age of patients: 74 +/- 14 years) implanted entire
ly in the electrophysiology laboratory at our institution. All procedures w
ere performed by two cardiologists. Three-hundred and four patients (60.8%)
received a dual-chamber device. After 3 months of follow-up, procedure-rel
ated com plications occurred in 19 patients (3.8%). The most frequent compl
ication was lead dislodgement (1.4%). There were 2 postoperative infections
(0.4%). The mean time to hospital discharge after the implant was 2.9 +/-
1.6 days.
Conclusions - These results show that permanent pacemaker implantation may
be successfully carried out by cardiologists in the electrophysiology labor
atory with a low complication rate. Atrial lead dislodgement seems to be th
e most frequent complication in centres with a high proportion of dual-cham
ber pacemaker implantations.