Conventional analyses used to interpret filtration data assume a constant i
nternal liquid flow rate (q(L)) and a negligible solid velocity (the consta
nt-q(L) approximation). To interpret such data, the upper bounds of errors
to estimate alpha(av) and k(av) were analytically derived by the constant-q
(L) approximation. The solution of the filtration model that incorporates a
nonzero solid velocity was then analytically derived. When filtering a hig
hly compactible filter cake, the cake was first compacted toward the filter
medium that forms a skin layer and, in doing so, rapidly reaches the stead
y-state distribution predicted by the constant-q(L) approximation. Except a
t the first stage of the filtration, the approach of Tiller et al. (1999) i
s valid for interpreting filtration data of a highly compactible filter cak
e. Furthermore, the constant-q(L) approximation provides the upper limit of
errors in terms of estimating cake characteristics regardless of the solid
velocity effect.