W. Burger et al., Effect of atenolol and celiprolol on acetylcholine-induced coronary vasomotion in coronary artery disease, AM J CARD, 85(2), 2000, pp. 172-177
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Earlier studies have reported on the potentiated muscarinic vasoconstrictio
n of intracoronary acetylcholine after metoprolol application in patients w
ith coronary artery disease. The present study investigated the effect of c
eliprolol, atenolol and placebo on acetylcholine-induced vasomotion in pati
ents with coronary artery disease. Furthermore, direct effects on coronary
vasomotion and on hemodynamics were evaluated. Acetylcholine (intracoronary
concentrations of 6.3 x 10(-7), 2.0 x 10(-6), and 6.3 x 10(-6) M) was give
n before and after double-blind celiprolol (0.30 mg/kg NJ, atenolol (0.15 m
g/kg IV), or placebo in 3 x 12 patients. Vasomotion was investigated by qua
ntitative coronary angiography in proximal and distal segments of epicardia
l coronary arteries, and by the determination of the coronary resistance in
dex based on Doppler-flow measurements. The investigated drugs had no direc
t affect on the diameter of the epicardial coronary arteries. However, celi
prolol in contrast to atenolol, significantly reduced systemic vascular res
istance (change after atenolol: from 1,855 +/- 308 to 2,161 +/- 550 dyne s
cm(-5); celiprolol: 1,691 +/- 435 to 1,411 +/- 343 dyne s cm(-5); and place
bo: 1,722 +/- 215 to 1,710 +/- 213 dyne s cm(-5), p < 0.001) and the corona
ry resistance index (change after atenolol: 2.52 +/- 3.58 to 2.86 +/- 4.24;
celiprolol: 2.70 +/- 1,55 to 2.49 +/- 2.26; and placebo: 1.97 +/- 1.35 to
1.92 +/- 1.25, p <0.01). Celiprolol, atenolol, and placebo did not have dif
ferent effects on acetylcholine-induced coronary vasomotion of epicardial c
onductance vessels (diminution of proximal lumen diameter before/after aten
olol: 0.42 +/- 0.39/0.44 +/- 0.39 mm; celiprolol: 0.32 +/- 0.26/0.30 +/- 0.
24 mm; and placebo: 0.36 +/- 0.29/0.43 +/- 0.40 mm) and of coronary resista
nce vessels (reduction of coronary resistance index before/after atenolol:
1.95 +/- 4.74/1.92 +/- 3.74; celiprolol: 0.98 +/- 0.73/1.41 +/- 1.50; and p
lacebo: 1.16 +/- 1.29/1.16 +/- 1.04). In contrast to atenolol, celiprolol p
ossesses vasodilative properties in systemic and coronary resistance vessel
s. There wets no direct effect on the diameter of conductance vessels, Acet
ylcholine-induced coronary vasomotion both in conductance and resistance ve
ssels was not influenced by the beta blockers that were studied. This sugge
sts that atenolol and celiprolol do not influence endothelium-dependent, ni
tric oxide related vasomotion. (C) 2000 by Excerpta Medica, inc.