Protraction headgears are commonly used in the treatment of Class III maloc
clusion characterized by maxillary retrognathism. The upward and forward ro
tation of the maxilla during protraction is a major unwanted side effect. T
he aim of this study was to eliminate the upward and forward rotation of ma
xilla while protracting. Seventeen patients with Class III malocclusion as
a result of maxillary retrognathism were treated for 3 months; their averag
e age was 12.81 years. A full coverage acrylic cap splint-type rapid maxill
ary expansion appliance was cemented and activated twice a day for 5 days.
After sutural separation, a maxillary modified protraction headgear was wor
n and 750 g of force was applied. Wilcoxon signed rank test was carried out
to evaluate 42 parameters measured on cephalometric radiographs. The maxil
la was displaced anteriorly by downward and backward rotation. The mandible
was displaced downward and backward due to anterior elongation of the maxi
lla. Extrusion and lingual tipping of the upper incisors and intrusion of u
pper molars and downward and backward rotation of functional occlusal plane
were observed, The aim of our study was achieved, which was to avoid upwar
d and forward rotation while protracting the maxilla. In conclusion, maxill
ary modified protraction headgear (MMPH) can be used effectively in Class I
II patients with retrognathic maxilla and anterior open bite tendency.