R. Rubio et G. Ceballos, Role of the endothelial glycocalyx in dromotropic, inotropic, and arrythmogenic effects of coronary flow, AM J P-HEAR, 278(1), 2000, pp. H106-H116
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY
Coronary flow regulates cardiac functions, and it has been suggested that e
ndothelial membrane glycosylated proteins are the primary shear stress mech
anosensors. Our hypothesis was that if these proteins are the sensors for f
low, then intracoronary perfusion of lectins or specific antibodies should
differentially depress coronary flow-enhanced responses of different parenc
hymal cell types such as auricular-ventricular (A-V) nodal cells (dromotrop
ic effect), contractile myocytes (inotropic effect), and junctional Purkinj
e-muscle cells (spontaneous ventricular rhythm). The coronary flow stimulat
ory effects on A-V delay and spontaneous ventricular rhythm were selectivel
y depressed by six of eight lectins. None of the lectins depressed the coro
nary flow inotropic effect. Antibodies against endothelial surface proteins
, alpha(v)beta(5)-integrin and sialyl-Lewis(b) glycan, depressed the dromot
ropic but not the inotropic effects of coronary flow, whereas the vascular
cell adhesion molecule 1 antibody had no effect on the dromotropic, but enh
anced the inotropic, effect. The fact that lectins and antibodies different
ially depressed regional coronary flow effects suggests that there is a che
mical distinctiveness in their intravascular endothelial cell surfaces. How
ever, nonselective cross-linking of endothelial glycocalyx proteins with 2,
000-kDa dextranaldehyde or vitronectin indistinctively depressed the dromot
ropic and inotropic effects of coronary flow. These results indicate that c
oronary flow-induced stress acts on specific structures located in the capi
llary intravascular membrane glycocalyx.