Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services

Citation
S. Zaza et al., Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services, AM J PREV M, 18(1), 2000, pp. 44-74
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
07493797 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Supplement
S
Pages
44 - 74
Database
ISI
SICI code
0749-3797(200001)18:1<44:DCIAPF>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Introduction. A standardized abstraction form and procedure was developed t o provide consistency, reduce bias, and improve validity and reliability in the Guide to Community Preventative Services: Systematic Reviews and Evide nce-Based Recommendations (the Guide). Data Collection Instrument. The content of the abstraction form was based o n methodologies used in other systematic reviews; reporting standards estab lished by major health and social science journals; the evaluation, statist ical and meta-analytic literature; expert opinion and review; and pilot-tes ting. The form is used to classify and describe key characteristics of the intervention and evaluation (26 questions) and assess the quality of the st udy's execution (23 questions). Study procedures and results are collected and specific threats to the validity of the study are assessed across six c ategories (intervention and study descriptions, sampling, measurement, anal ysis, interpretation of results and other execution issues), Data CollectionProcedures. Each study is abstracted by two independent revi ewers and reconciled by the chapter development team. Reviewers are trained and provided with feedback, Discussion. What to abstract and how to summarize the data are discretionar y choices that influence conclusions drawn on the quality of execution of t he study and its effectiveness. The form balances flexibility for the evalu ation of papers with different study designs and intervention types with th e need to ask specific questions to maximize validity and reliability. It p rovides a structured format that researchers and others can use to rede-Lv the content and quality of papers, conduct systematic reviews, or develop m anuscripts. A systematic approach to developing and evaluating manuscripts will help to promote overall improvement of the scientific literature. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): data abstraction, evaluation, study design , study quality (C) 2000 American Journal of Preventive Medicine.