Vg. Carande-kulis et al., Methods for systematic reviews of economic evaluations for the Guide to Community Preventive Services, AM J PREV M, 18(1), 2000, pp. 75-91
Objectives. This paper describes the methods used in the Guide to Community
Preventive Services: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Recommendations
(the Guide) for conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations acro
ss community health-promotion and disease-prevention interventions. The lac
k of standardized methods to improve the comparability of results from econ
omic evaluations has hampered the use of data on costs and financial benefi
ts in evidence-based reviews of effectiveness. The methods and instruments
developed for the Guide provide an explicit and systematic approach for abs
tracting economic evaluation data and increase the usefulness of economic i
nformation for policy making in health care and public health.
Methods. The following steps were taken for systematic reviews of economic
evaluations: (1) systematic searches were conducted; (2) studies using econ
omic analytic methods, such as cost analysis or cost-effectiveness, cost-be
nefit or cost-utility analysis, were selected according to explicit inclusi
on criteria; (3) economic data were abstracted and adjusted using a standar
dized abstraction form; and (4) adjusted summary measures were listed in su
mmary tables.
Results. These methods were used in a review of 10 interventions designed t
o improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents and adults. Ten ave
rage costs and 14 cost-effectiveness ratios were abstracted or calculated f
rom data reported in 24 studies and expressed in 1997 USD. The types of cos
ts included in the analysis and intervention definitions varied extensively
. Gaps in data were found for many interventions.
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): cost-effectiveness, costs, economic evalua
tion, systematic reviews (C) 2000 American Journal of Preventive Medicine.