OBJECTIVE. We evaluated whether the use of multiple window and level settin
gs on a soft-copy workstation improves diagnostic accuracy on chest and abd
ominal CT. We hypothesized that routinely using window and level settings d
uring soft-copy interpretation would beneficially affect the final diagnosi
s without compromising efficiency.
MATERIALS AND METHODS, Two hundred three randomly selected abdominal and ch
est CT scans were interpreted by three radiologists using a four-monitor so
ft-copy workstation (images per screen, nine; resolution, 2K). After the in
itial interpretations, all scans were reevaluated by the same radiologists
using additional liver and bone window and level settings. Differences in c
onspicuity and characterization of abnormalities were graded on a three-poi
nt scale.
RESULTS. Conspicuity and characterization of abnormalities were improved in
67% of abnormal findings (81/121; p = 0.01). Improvement (a finding that s
ubstantially affected the final diagnosis) was present in 18% of abnormal f
indings (22/121; p = 0.04). On average, the evaluation of images at multipl
e window and level settings required an additional 40 sec per case.
CONCLUSION. The use of multiple window and level settings during soft-copy
interpretation resulted in improved lesion detectability and characterizati
on with greater diagnostic efficacy. Using soft-copy workstations, radiolog
ists can evaluate images using multiple settings without compromising effic
iency.