Kj. Economopoulos et al., Comparison of carotid endarterectomy using primary closure, patch closure,and eversion techniques, AM J SURG, 178(6), 1999, pp. 505-509
BACKGROUND: This Study was undertaken to evaluate the role of eversion enda
rterectomy in the management of extracranial carotid occlusive disease.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing ca
rotid endarterectomy between July 1994 and July 1998. After reviewing the r
ecords, patients were assigned to one of three groups: eversion (ECEA); ope
n with primary closure (CEA degrees); or open with patch closure (CEAP). St
atistical comparisons were made.
RESULTS: The 190 index cases comprised 33 ECEA (17%), 15 CEA degrees (8%),
and 142 CEAP (75%). Both ECEA and CEA degrees were more likely to be done o
n males versus females compared with CEAP (P = 0.01), For the entire 190 ca
ses, stroke occurred in 1 patient (0.5%); and myocardial infarction in 2 pa
tients (1%), resulting in death in both. Two patients (1.4%) in the CEAP gr
oup have undergone redo surgery at 8 and 24 months,
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that eversion endarterectomy achieves
early results similar to open endarterectomy with and without patch closure
. Am J Surg. 1999;178:505-510, (C) 1999 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.