Mr. Phillips et al., Repair of anterior leaflet mitral valve prolapse: Chordal replacement versus chordal shortening, ANN THORAC, 69(1), 2000, pp. 25-29
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background. To determine the optimal method of repair for severe, segmental
anterior leaflet prolapse, we analyzed outcome of 121 patients who underwe
nt chordal shortening (n = 46) and chordal replacement (n = 75) from 1988 t
o 1996.
Methods. Chordae were replaced with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene suture
s. Patients had an annuloplasty with either chordal replacement or shorteni
ng. Follow-up was 100% complete (mean, 3.7 years).
Results. Mean age was 62.1 years, 86 were men, and 60 patients had isolated
valve repair. There was one hospital death and 14 late deaths for a 5-year
actuarial survival of 86.4% +/- 4.5%. Sixteen patients underwent reoperati
on, 5 in the replacement group and 11 in the shortening group. Mechanism of
valve failure in the replacement group was native chordae rupture (n = 4)
and neochordae dehiscence (n = 1). With chordal shortening, repair failure
was attributed to rupture of shortened chordae (n = 8), leaflet prolapse wi
th and without annuloplasty ring dehiscence (n = 2), and native chordae elo
ngation (n = 1). Risk of reoperation because of repair failure at 3.5 years
was 1.4% in the chordal replacement group and 14.8% in the chordal shorten
ing group (p = 0.02).
Conclusions. Chordal replacement is superior to chordal shortening, providi
ng a predictable method for correction of mitral regurgitation with a low i
ncidence of reoperation. (C) 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.