Background. Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with a small aorti
c annulus may pose difficult problems in terms of prosthesis selection. We
have evaluated the hemodynamic performance of the 21-mm Carpentier-Edwards
Perimount bioprosthesis implanted in elderly patients.
Methods. From July 1996 to June 1998, 19 patients (17 women acid 2 men, mea
n age 76 +/- 4 years and mean body surface area 1.73 +/- 0.13 m(2)), had ao
rtic valve replacement with a 21-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthe
sis. The hemodynamic performance of the valve was evaluated in 16 patients,
who completed at least a 6-month follow-up interval, with transthoracic co
lor; Doppler echocardiography with particular reference to peak and mean tr
ansprosthetic gradients, effective orifice area index, and regression of le
ft ventricular mass index.
Results. There were no late deaths and no major postoperative complications
. At a mean follow-up of 12 +/- 7 months, compared to discharge, all patien
ts showed clinical improvement with a significant reduction of Beak gradien
t (from 23 +/- 4 to 21 +/- 6 mm Hg, p = 0.04) and left ventricular mass ind
ex (from 181 +/- 23 to 153 +/- 20 g/m(2); p < 0.001), whereas mean gradient
(from 13 +/- 3 to 13 +/- 4 mm Hg, p = not significant) and effective orifi
ce area index (from 1.12 +/- 0.34 to 1.13 +/- 0.28 cm(2)/m(2), p = not sign
ificant) remained substantially unchanged.
Conclusions. The use of a 21-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis
is associated with low transprosthetic gradients and significant reduction
in left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. The results
of our study suggest that a 21-m Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesi
s should be considered a valid option in elderly patients with aortic valve
disease and a small aortic annulus. (C) 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Su
rgeons.