Ja. Richter et al., Drew-Anderson Technique attenuates systemic inflammatory response syndromeand improves respiratory function after coronary artery bypass grafting, ANN THORAC, 69(1), 2000, pp. 77-83
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background. Cardiopulmonary bypass causes inflammatory reactions leading to
organ dysfunction postoperatively. This study was undertaken to determine
whether using patients' own lungs as oxygenator in a bilateral circuit (Dre
w-Anderson Technique) could reduce systemic inflammatory response to cardio
pulmonary bypass, improving patients clinical outcome following coronary ar
tery bypass grafting.
Methods. A prospective randomized controlled trial involving 30 patients, d
ivided in two groups of 15 patients each, undergoing elective coronary arte
ry bypass grafting, was undertaken. In the Drew-group bilateral extracorpor
eal circulation using patient's lung as oxygenator was performed. The other
patients served as control group, where standard cardiopulmonary bypass pr
ocedure was used.
Results. pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators were measured. Pe
ak concentrations of pro-inflammatory interleukin-6, interleukin-8, were si
gnificantly lower in 15 patients undergoing Drew-Anderson Technique compare
d with the concentrations measured in 15 patients treated with standard car
diopulmonary bypass technique. Differences in patient recovery were analyze
d with respect to time of intubation, blood loss, intrapulmonary shunting,
oxygenation, and respiratory index. In patients undergoing uncomplicated co
ronary artery bypass grafting procedures bilateral extracorporeal circulati
on using the patients' own lung as oxygenator provided significant biochemi
cal and clinical benefit in comparison to the standard cardiopulmonary bypa
ss procedure.
Conclusions. This prospective randomized clinical study has demonstrated th
at exclusion of an artificial oxygenator from cardiopulmonary bypass circui
t si,significantly decreases the activation of inflammatory reaction, and t
hat interventions that attenuate this response may result in more favorable
clinical outcome. (C) 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.