F. De Lalla et al., Regional prophylaxis with teicoplanin in monolateral or bilateral total knee replacement: an open study, ANTIM AG CH, 44(2), 2000, pp. 316-319
From January 1991 to June 1997, patients undergoing primary elective monola
teral or bilateral total knee replacement (TKR) were consecutively enrolled
in a prospective, open clinical study on the efficacy and safety of region
al prophylaxis with teicoplanin (TEC), Those scheduled for monolateral TKR
(115 patients) received 400 mg of TEC in 100 mi of saline as a 5-min infusi
on into a foot vein of the leg to be operated on immediately after the tour
niquet was inflated to 400 mm Hg (ca, 50 kPa), For patients undergoing bila
teral surgery (45 patients), regional administration of TEC was also repeat
ed for the second knee operation. Follow-up ranged from a minimum of 2 year
s to 8 years. None of the patients experienced local or systemic adverse ef
fects following regional administration of TEC. In the immediate postoperat
ive and 2-year follow-up periods, only one superficial infection of the pri
mary site attributable to intraoperative contamination (prophylaxis failure
) out of the 205 prostheses implanted was observed. Deep infections involvi
ng the prosthesis did not occur. Infectious complications at distant sites
were observed in nine cases (urinary tract infection due to Escherichia col
i in eight cases, and Salmonella enteritidis gastroenteritis in one case) i
n the immediate postoperative period; they all were rapidly cured after ant
ibiotic treatment. A delayed prosthetic infection, related to hematogenous
spread of the etiological agent and therefore not considered a prophylactic
failure, was observed in a patient who had undergone TKR 5 years before. R
egional administration of TEC in monolateral and bilateral TKR appears to b
e a safe and valuable prophylactic technique.