Previous tests of the long-run neutrality hypothesis have generally relied
on annual time series data. This paper analyses the long-run neutrality of
money in Australia using different sources of intra-year data, which permit
s an examination of the effects of seasonality and the robustness of previo
us empirical results. A reduced form ARIMA model is used with both quarterl
y seasonally unadjusted and adjusted Australian real GDP and nominal money
supply to test the neutrality hypothesis. Using two measures of money stock
, namely M1 and M3, it is shown that the hypothesis is supported using M1 a
s the measure of money supply, while it is rejected using M3. Recent trends
and developments in the money and credit markets in Australia provide a po
ssible explanation of the sensitivity of the outcome to the measure of mone
y stock employed in the analysis.