Economic evaluation of improved mechanical harvesting systems for eastern thornless blackberries

Citation
Jk. Harper et al., Economic evaluation of improved mechanical harvesting systems for eastern thornless blackberries, APPL ENG AG, 15(6), 1999, pp. 597-603
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE
ISSN journal
08838542 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
597 - 603
Database
ISI
SICI code
0883-8542(199911)15:6<597:EEOIMH>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Three blackberry production systems which combine a mechanical harvester em ploying a new shaking principle with open trellis designs (V-, Y-, and rota table Y-trellises) were evaluated to determine profit potential. Given a si ngle cultivar planting of 4.7 ha and current fresh-market prices, all three machine harvest systems are profitable. When ;compared to a hand-harvested I-trellis, fresh-market packouts of from 72 to 132% of total yield would b e required for the machine harvesting systems to have equal profitability T he relative profitability, of the I-trellis, however, is very sensitive to increases in hand-harvest cost and decreases in fresh-market price. A 20% f all in price would reduce breakeven packout for the mechanical harvester to 27 to 70%. A $0.30/kg increase in hand harvest cost would reduce breakeven packout to 29 to 73%. The machine-harvesting systems are profitable under a greater range of price and yields than the 1-trellis. Machine-harvesting systems are profitable at prices as low as $0.48 to $0.67/kg, while hand-ha rvesting systems need prices of at least $1.42 to $1.55/kg to cover costs. Machine-harvesting systems are profitable at yields as low as 13 to 31% of expected yield for fresh market, while hand-harvesting systems need yields of 44 to 49% to breakeven. Low harvest cost indicates that machine-harvesti ng systems would also be profitable for processing growers. Hand-harvesting systems are not profitable under current processing prices.