Many types of acrosome induction tests require special equipment and reagen
ts that are not available to most clinicians; thus, simpler tests seem desi
rable. A modified acrosome induction test has been developed that uses basi
c reagents and a light microscope, which are available in most office setti
ngs. A hypoosmotic swelling test and a double stain (Bismark brown and rose
Bengal) were combined to evaluate the viable acrosome reaction (AR) among
74 infertile men and 42 control men. The study included 34 infertile males
without varicoceles, 20 with nonrepaired varicoceles and 20 with repaired v
aricoceles. On each test day, a specimen from a fertile donor was run as a
control. The spontaneous acrosome reaction was recorded in semen before and
after capacitation. The final % viable acrosome reaction equaled the capac
itated value minus the spontaneous value for whole semen. The mean % viable
AR among the control specimens was 16% with no values less than 10%. This
mean value for controls was significantly greater than the mean % viable AR
in each patient group. There were no overlaps in the 95% confidence interv
als. When the study group was stratified according to normal acrosome induc
tion tests or >10% viable AR, 30 patients had a normal test and 44 had abno
rmal tests. Six patients with varicoceles and an abnormal acrosome inductio
n test had a varicocelectomy, and 2 (33%) converted their acrosome inductio
n test to normal after at least 6 months of follow-up. Nine patients had in
vitro fertilization (IVF), 3 had a poor result, and all had an abnormal ac
rosome induction test. Six had a good result with IVF and all 6 had a norma
l acrosome induction test. Thus, the acrosome induction test described in t
his report may be performed in any office laboratory to detect subtle male
factor problems. The results may be helpful for planning IVF, intracytoplas
mic sperm injection, or varicocele surgery for infertile men.