Background: Recent shifts in reimbursement toward capitation makes appointm
ent availability a significant resource and stimulates us to understand pri
mary care physician (hereafter referred to as "provider") behavior concerni
ng appointment assignment. The results of prior studies suggest significant
provider variability in this area.
Objective: To examine the influences on assigning patient revisit intervals
in the ambulatory setting.
Methods: Survey regarding general care issues of hypothetical diabetic and
hypertensive patients seen in an ambulatory setting was given to 62 provide
rs in the Internal Medicine Program at the Tulane University Internal Medic
ine Residency Program and outpatient clinics, New Orleans, La. Measurements
evaluated included survey responses for demographics (sex, year of birth,
year of graduation from medical school, and level of training) and practice
style (decision to change therapy, order tests, and recommended return app
ointment interval in weeks) variables.
Results: The response rate was 89% (56 providers). Most respondents were me
n (n = 39). Wide variation was noted in assignment of reappointment interva
l with mean return intervals for the scenarios ranging from 2.2 to 20.5 wee
ks. Significant influences on provider practice included patient stability
(P < .001), the decision to change therapy (P = .001), and the decision to
order tests (P = .001). All correlated with an earlier return appointment.
Some providers exhibited test-ordering tendencies across scenarios. Sex was
a significant provider in dependent variable and was not influenced by oth
er study variables. Female providers assigned earlier reappointment interva
ls for their patients.
Conclusions: Wide variation exists among practitioners with similar trainin
g background and practice setting. Bs expected, patient stability was a maj
or determinant of assigned return interval. Test-ordering behaviors may con
sume appointments inappropriately and may be a productive area for efforts
to reduce provider variability. The influence of the provider's sex on sche
duling follow-up appointments warrants further investigation.