T. Miyaji et al., Soft X-ray AGN luminosity function from ROSAT surveys - I. Cosmological evolution and contribution to the soft X-ray background, ASTRON ASTR, 353(1), 2000, pp. 25-40
We investigate the evolution of the 0.5-2 keV soft Xray luminosity function
(SXLF) of active galactic nuclei (AGN) using results from ROSAT surveys of
various depth. The large dynamic range of the combined sample, from shallo
w large-area ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS)-based samples to the deepest point
ed observation on the Lockman Hole, enabled us to trace the behavior of the
SXLF The combined sample includes about 690 ACNs. As previously found, the
SXLF evolves rapidly as a function of redshift up to z similar to 1.5 and
is consistent with remaining constant beyond this redshift.
We have tried to find a simple analytical description of the SXLF in the ov
erall redshift and luminosity range, using Maximum-Likelihood fits and Kolg
omorov-Smirnov tests. We found that a form of the Luminosity-Dependent Dens
ity Evolution (LDDE), rather than the classical Pure Luminosity Evolution (
PLE) or the Pure Density Evolution (PDE) models, gives an excellent fit to
the data. Extrapolating one form of the LDDE model (LDDE1) explains approxi
mate to 60% of the estimated soft extragalactic Cosmic X-ray Background (CX
RB). We have also found another representation (LDDE2), which produces appr
oximate to 90% of the CXRB and still gives an excellent fit to the sample A
GNs. These two versions of the LDDE models can be considered two extremes o
f the possible extrapolations of the SXLF below the Aux limit of the survey
.
We have also investigated the evolution of the number density of luminous Q
SOs with Log L-x > 44.5 [h(50)erg s(-1)], where the evolution can be traced
up to the high luminosity. We have compared the results with similar quant
ities in optically- and radio-selected luminous QSOs. Unlike these QSOs, ev
olution of the ROSAT-selected QSOs does not show evidence for the decrease
of the number density in z greater than or similar to 3. The statistical si
gnificance of the difference is, however, marginal.