Dienes & Perner (D&P) link explicit knowledge of facts to predication. But
predication is basically a linguistic notion. Their approach therefore make
s it difficult to attribute knowledge of facts to non-language-users, such
as animals. The explicit/implicit distinction, as D&P Formulate it, is acco
rdingly of little use for exploring the cognitive capacities of nonhuman pr
imates - despite the increasing evidence for sophisticated social awareness
among apes, implying mental representations of events in which participant
s are clearly distinguished. A revised formulation, less biased toward synt
ax as it happens to have evolved in humans, could avoid this drawback.