Dr. Jason et Br. Peterson, PRETRIAL COMMUNICATION WITH DEFENSE COUNSEL BY MEDICAL EXAMINERS PATHOLOGISTS, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology, 18(2), 1997, pp. 124-128
Forensic pathologists (FPs) form opinions in homicide trials and often
are key witnesses for the prosecution. Early access to the FP by defe
nse counsel may be strategically important, but state statutes differ
regarding pretrial availability of the autopsy report to the defense,
and the degree of pretrial communication that is permissible or desira
ble between the FP and defense is unclear. We surveyed a sample of FPs
to determine their practices and opinions regarding pretrial communic
ation with the defense. We compared responses with years of training,
early professional role models, local autopsy report disclosure statut
es, and reasons for practices. All respondents indicated a willingness
to informally communicate with the defense, but many would notify the
prosecutor and some wanted prosecutor's presence or permission. Prose
cutorial involvement correlated with work load and with stated reasons
for practices. Case law in most states prohibits the prosecutor from
interfering with defense communication with witnesses, including exper
ts. However, witnesses are free to refuse to talk informally to the de
fense. Some states limit publication of the autopsy report outside for
mal trial discovery procedures. Only one state, Arkansas, does not all
ow the medical examiner to give out any information, thereby precludin
g informal communication with the defense in that state.