Data are reported on 28 deaf individuals who were convicted, pled guilty, o
r have been charged and awaiting trial for murder. The unique forensic issu
es raised by these cases are discussed, and their clinical picture presente
d. A significant percentage of these deaf murderers and defendants had such
severely limited communication skills in both English and American Sign La
nguage that they lacked the linguistic ability to understand the charges ag
ainst them and/or to participate in their own defense. As such, they were i
ncompetent to stand trial, due not to mental illness or mental retardation,
but to linguistic deficits. This form of incompetence poses a dilemma to t
he courts that remains unresolved. This same linguistic disability makes it
impossible for some deaf suspects to be administered Miranda Warnings in a
way comprehensible to them. This paper identifies the reasons for the comm
unication problems many deaf persons face in court and offers remedial step
s to help assure fair trials and police interrogations for deaf defendants.
The roles and responsibilities of psychiatric and psychological experts in
these cases are discussed. Data are provided on the etiology of the 28 ind
ividuals' hearing losses, psychiatric/psychological histories, IQs, communi
cation characteristics, educational levels, and victim characteristics. Cop
yright (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.