Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of touch screen systemwith leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests

Citation
W. Graham et al., Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of touch screen systemwith leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests, BR MED J, 320(7228), 2000, pp. 155-159
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
09598138 → ACNP
Volume
320
Issue
7228
Year of publication
2000
Pages
155 - 159
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-8138(20000115)320:7228<155:RCTCEO>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Objective To compare the effectiveness of touch screen system with informat ion leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests. Design Randomised controlled trial; participants allocated to intervention group (given access to touch screen and leaflet information) or control gro up (leaflet information only). Setting Antenatal clinic in university teaching hospital. Subjects 875 women booking antenatal care. Interventions All participants received a leaflet providing information on prenatal tests. Women in the intervention arm also had access to touch scre en information system in antenatal clinic. Main outcome measures Women's informed decision making on prenatal testing as measured by their uptake of and understanding of the purpose of specific tests; their satisfaction with information provided; and their levels of a nxiety. Results All women in the trial had a good baseline knowledge of prenatal te sts. Women in the intervention group did not show any greater understanding of the purpose of the tests than control women. However, uptake of detaile d anomaly scans was significantly higher in intervention group lan the cont rol group (94% (351/375)v 87% (310/358), P = 0.0014). Levels of anxiety amo ng nulliparous women in intervention group declined significantly over time (P < 0.001). Conclusions The touch screen seemed to convey no benefit over well prepared leaflets in improving understanding of prenatal tests among the pregnant w omen. It did, however, seem to reduce levels of anxiety and may be most eff ective for providing information to selected women who have a relevant adve rse history or abnormal results from tests in their current pregnancy.