Sensory and instrumental relationships of texture of cooked rice from selected cultivars and postharvest handling practices

Citation
Bg. Lyon et al., Sensory and instrumental relationships of texture of cooked rice from selected cultivars and postharvest handling practices, CEREAL CHEM, 77(1), 2000, pp. 64-69
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Agricultural Chemistry
Journal title
CEREAL CHEMISTRY
ISSN journal
00090352 → ACNP
Volume
77
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
64 - 69
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-0352(200001/02)77:1<64:SAIROT>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Measurement of cooked rice texture attributes by sensory and instrumental m ethods is important because of the increased popularity of rice and rice pr oducts by globally diverse cultures. Many factors influence cooked rice tex ture, including cultivar, physicochemical properties, postharvest handling practices (milling degree, drying conditions, and final moisture), and cook ing method. Information on the relationships between sensory, physical, and chemical characteristics will lead to better methods to quickly evaluate a nd predict end-use qualities, which will help to match rices with specific characteristics to populations that demand those attributes. This article r eports the relationships between two modes of measuring texture attributes of rices: sensory and instrumental texture analyzers. Six medium- and short -grain rice samples differing by cultivar or growing location were dried to achieve final moisture levels of 12 or 15% and then regular- or deep-mille d (n = 120). Correlations between individual sensory descriptive attributes and instrumental texture profile parameters were weak. Of only 12 signific ant correlations, the highest value was r = 0.624. Combined sensory and ins trumental data were factor-analyzed, This analysis revealed that sensory at tributes still accounted for the most variation (35.32% out of 76.55%). Sen sory descriptive analysis was more sensitive to subtle changes in initial t exture perception including parameters relating to stickiness and adhesiven ess. The two-cycle compression test for texture profile parameters (i.e., h ardness, cohesiveness, adhesiveness, gumminess, springiness, and chewiness) accounted for less variation in the data on texture differences.