Fracture stiffness measurement using the orthometer: reproducibility and sources of error

Citation
Sj. Eastaugh-waring et al., Fracture stiffness measurement using the orthometer: reproducibility and sources of error, CLIN BIOMEC, 15(2), 2000, pp. 140-142
Citations number
4
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
ISSN journal
02680033 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
140 - 142
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-0033(200002)15:2<140:FSMUTO>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Objectives. To elicit the reproducibility and the common sources of error i n the use of the Orthometer, a commercially available goniometer based syst em, designed to measure the stiffness of healing fractures. Design. A laboratory based study. Background. The Orthometer is widely used to measure the progress of fractu re healing in a quantitative manner. It has been shown previously that the bending stiffness of a fracture increases with healing and that a stiffness of 15 Nm/degree equates with the functional union of a tibial fracture. Methods. The Orthometer was attached in a standard manner to nylon bars of known stiffness to determine the accuracy of the device. The Orthometer was then set up with changes in a single positional variable to assess the eff ect of this variable on the measurement accuracy. A number of different cli nicians were asked to use the Orthometer before and after a simple training session and any improvements in the measurement accuracy were observed. Results. Stiffness could be measured to within 10% or less of the true stif fness. Markedly different degrees of error were introduced with the various set-up variables. A simple training session improved clinician accuracy. Conclusions. Although the Orthometer does allow some degree of safety margi n, it is essential that set-up is performed carefully, and that the clinici an has been trained in the use of the device.