Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations

Citation
Pc. Rodkin et al., Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations, DEVEL PSYCH, 36(1), 2000, pp. 14-24
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00121649 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
14 - 24
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-1649(200001)36:1<14:HOPBAA>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
This study examined subtypes of popular 4th-6th grade boys (N = 452). Popul ar-prosocial (model) and popular-antisocial (tough) configurations were ide ntified by means of teacher ratings and compared with peer and self-assessm ents and social centrality measures. Peers perceived model boys as cool, at hletic, leaders, cooperative, studious, not shy, and nonaggressive. Peers p erceived tough boys as cool, athletic, and antisocial. Model boys saw thems elves as nonaggressive and academically competent. Tough boys saw themselve s as popular, aggressive, and physically competent. Tough boys were disprop ortionately African American, particularly when African Americans were a mi nority in their classrooms. Model and tough boys were overrepresented at nu clear social centrality levels. These findings suggest that highly aggressi ve boys can be among the most popular and socially connected children in el ementary classrooms.