Prospective assessment of primary rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
Jg. Guillem et al., Prospective assessment of primary rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, DIS COL REC, 43(1), 2000, pp. 18-24
PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective study a-as to determine the abilit
y of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to assess
extent of pathologically confirmed rectal cancer response to preoperative r
adiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with prim
ary rectal cancer deemed eligible for preoperative radiation and 5-fluorour
acil-based chemotherapy because of a clinically bulky or tethered tumor or
endorectal ultrasound evidence of T3 and/or N1 were prospectively enrolled.
Positron emission tomography and CT scans were obtained before preoperativ
e radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (5,040 cGy to the pelvis
and 2 cycles of bolus 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin) and repeated four to
fire weeks after completion of radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemother
apy. In addition to routine pathologic staging, detailed assessment of rect
al cancer response to preoperative radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemo
therapy was performed independently by two pathologists. Positron emission
tomography parameters studied included conventional measures such as standa
rdized uptake value (average and maximum), positron emission tomography-der
ived tumor volume (size), and two novel parameters: visual response score a
nd change in total lesion glycolysis. RESULTS: Of 21 patients enrolled, pro
spective data (pretreatment and posttreatment positron emission tomography,
and complete pathologic assessment) were available an 15 patients. All 15
demonstrated pathologic response to preoperative radiation and 5-fluorourac
il-based chemotherapy. This was confirmed in 100 percent of the cases by po
sitron emission tomography compared with 78 percent (7/9) by CT, In additio
n, one positron emission tomography parameter (visual response score) accur
ately estimated the extent of pathologic response in 60 percent (9/15) of c
ases compared with 22 percent (2/9) of cases with CT. CONCLUSIONS: This pil
ot study demonstrates that fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission
tomography imaging adds incremental information to the preoperative assess
ment of patients with rectal cancer. However, further studies in a larger s
eries of patients are needed to verify these findings and to determine the
value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in a p
reoperative strategy aimed at identifying patients suitable for sphincter-p
reserving rectal cancer surgery.