Hl. Maclean et Lb. Lave, Environmental implications of alternative-fueled automobiles: Air quality and greenhouse gas tradeoffs, ENV SCI TEC, 34(2), 2000, pp. 225-231
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology,"Environmental Engineering & Energy
We analyze alternative fuel-powertrain options for internal combustion engi
ne automobiles. Fuel/engine efficiency, energy use, pollutant discharges, a
nd greenhouse gas emissions are estimated for spark and compression ignited
, direct injected (DI), and indirect injected (II) engines fueled by conven
tional and reformulated gasoline, reformulated diesel, compressed natural g
as (CNG), and alcohols. Since comparisons of fuels and technologies in diss
imilar vehicles are misleading, we hold emissions level, range (160 and 595
km), vehicle size class, and style (a 1998 Ford Taurus sedan) constant. At
present, CNG vehicles have the best exhaust emissions performance while DI
diesels have the worst. Compared to a conventional gasoline fueled II auto
mobile, greenhouse gases could be reduced by 40% by a DI CNG automobile and
by 25% by a DI diesel. Gasoline- and diesel-fueled automobiles are able to
attain long ranges with little weight or fuel economy penalty. CNG vehicle
s have the highest penalty for increasing range, due to their heavy fuel st
orage systems, but are the most attractive for a 180-km range. DI engines,
particularly diesels, may not be able to meet strict emissions standards, a
t least not without lowering efficiency.