IOIBD questionnaire on the clinical use of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine,cyclosporin A and methotrexate in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases
Sgm. Meuwissen et al., IOIBD questionnaire on the clinical use of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine,cyclosporin A and methotrexate in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, EUR J GASTR, 12(1), 2000, pp. 13-18
Objective To obtain information on the clinical experience with azathioprin
e (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), cyclosporin A (CyA) and methotrexate (MTX
) in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by gas
troenterologists and internists in different countries.
Design A questionnaire designed by the International Organization for the S
tudy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IOIBD) was mailed to 300 gastroenterolo
gists, living in North America (n = 76) and Europe (n = 224) (12 countries)
, to obtain information on clinical experience.
Participants More than half of the respondents (168/298; 56.4%) worked in u
niversity hospitals and 58/298 (19.5%) in general (non-university) hospital
s. Two-thirds (65%) had more than 10 years' experience in gastroenterology.
Results The respondents had personal experience with AZA (88.4%), 6-MP (33.
3%), CyA (48.7%) and MTX (36.3%). AZA was prescribed more frequently in Eur
ope (92.6%) than in North America (74.2%) (P = 0.0002), 6-MP less frequentl
y by the European than the North American respondents (23.8 and 53.3% respe
ctively, P = 0.0001). Two-thirds (69.7%) usually prescribed AZA together wi
th steroids to Crohn's disease patients; 62.4% of the respondents prescribe
d AZA for periods longer than 24 months. For ulcerative colitis, 77.9% had
experience with AZA (Europe > North America, P = 0.0001). AZA had been pres
cribed by 69 respondents to pregnant patients, without apparent toxicity. A
cute pancreatitis had been observed after AZA by 56.7% respondents; 25 mali
gnancies were mentioned (six lymphoma, three leukaemia, three colon cancer,
four renal carcinoma, nine others), CyA had been prescribed in acute ulcer
ative colitis by 140/291 respondents (North America 45.1%, Europe 49.1%); o
f all respondents 63.9% treated < 5 patients with CyA, 36.1% 6-20 cases. Cy
A results were considered good in 29.5%, acceptable but with recurrences in
58.6%, and poor in 14.3%. MTX was prescribed in North America by 47.8% of
the respondents, and by 33.9% in Europe (not significant). Several signific
ant differences were observed between the prescription behaviour of respond
ents working at university hospitals and non-university hospitals, in parti
cular in relation to participation in clinical trials.
Conclusions Considerable experience exists in the use of immunosuppressive
therapy in IBD; however, differential prescription behaviour exists in the
choice of immunosuppressives between North America and Europe. These IOIBD
study results may contribute to a better insight in the daily use of immuno
suppressive agents in IBD by gastroenterologists and other specialists, (C)
2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.