We had younger. and older adults complete Two tasks that tested the attenti
onal- and memory-based inhibition models of negative priming. One task viol
ated May, Kane, & Hasher (1995, Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35-54) criteri
a for measuring just attentional inhibition, by including a repeated-target
condition. The other task complied with these criteria and included a dept
h of processing manipulation, where participants selected prime targets bas
ed either on their letter-length (nonsemantic processing) or weight (semant
ic processing). On balance, results supported the memory model, because dep
th of processing clearly moderated younger adult negative priming, and olde
r adults displayed,negative priming only in the task satisfying the attenti
onal-inhibition criteria (i.e., the depth of processing task). We conclude
that memory factors model ate negative priming, and that May et al.'s crite
ria fail to pl edict wizen older adults will show the effect.