Hydrophilic hydromer-coated polyurethane stents versus uncoated stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized trial

Citation
G. Costamagna et al., Hydrophilic hydromer-coated polyurethane stents versus uncoated stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized trial, GASTROIN EN, 51(1), 2000, pp. 8-11
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
ISSN journal
00165107 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
8 - 11
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-5107(200001)51:1<8:HHPSVU>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Background: Hydromer-coated polyurethane stents (HCPS) have a low coefficie nt of friction that may reduce sludge formation and potentially increase st ent longevity. Methods: Eighty-three patients (39 men, mean age 69.3 years) with malignant mid or distal bile duct strictures were prospectively randomized to receiv e either 10F HCPS (n = 40) or standard polyethylene stents (n = 43). Results: Fifteen patients (18.1%) underwent surgery after stent insertion. Six patients were lost to follow-up (7.2%), whereas 34 died of the underlyi ng disease without evidence of stent occlusion (15 HCPS group and 19 polyet hylene group). Median survival was 75 days (range 15 to 372 days) and 108 d ays (range 25 to 325 days) in the HOPS and polyethylene stent groups, respe ctively (p = not significant). Stent occlusion was observed in 25 patients (42%), 16 with HOPS stents and 9 with polyethylene stents, with a median pa tency of 103 days (range 40 to 280 days) and 68 days (range 32 to 175 days) , respectively (p = not significant). Conclusions: HOPS do not appear to provide significant clinical advantages in terms of stent longevity over standard plastic prostheses.