Wa. Rutala et al., Antimicrobial activity of home disinfectants and natural products against potential human pathogens, INFECT CONT, 21(1), 2000, pp. 33-38
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of both natural products (vinegar, baking
soda) and common commercial disinfectants (Vesphene IIse, TBQ, Clorox, Lys
ol Disinfectant Spray, Lysol Antibacterial Kitchen Cleaner, Mr. Clean Ultra
, ethanol) designed for home or institutional use against potential human p
athogens, including selected antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
DESIGN: A quantitative suspension test was used to assess the efficacy of s
elected disinfectants following exposure times of 30 seconds and 5 minutes.
Activity was assessed against Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella choleraesu
is, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Selected disinfec
tants were also tested against poliovirus, vancomycin-susceptible and -resi
stant Enterococcus species, and methicillin-susceptible and -resistant S au
reus.
RESULTS: The following compounds demonstrated excellent antimicrobial activ
ity (>5.8-8.2 log(10) reduction) at both expo-sure times: TBQ, Vesphene, Cl
orox, ethanol, and Lysol Antibacterial Kitchen Cleaner. Mr. Clean eliminate
d 4 to >6 logs,. and Lysol Disinfectant similar to 4 logs(10) of pathogenic
microorganisms at both exposure times. Vinegar eliminated <3 logs(10) of S
aureus and E coli, and baking soda <3 logs(10) of ail test pathogens. All
tested chemical disinfectants completely inactivated both antibiotic resist
ant and -susceptible bacteria at both exposure times. Only two disinfectant
s, Clorox and Lysol, demonstrated excellent activity (>3 log(10). reduction
) against poliovirus.
CONCLUSIONS: A variety of commercial household disinfectants were highly ef
fective against potential bacterial pathogens. The natural products were le
ss effective than commercial household disinfectants. Only Clorox and Lysol
disinfectant were effective against poliovirus (Infect Control Hosp Epidem
iol 2000;21:33-38).