Long-term safety and efficacy of amisulpride in subchronic or chronic schizophrenia

Citation
L. Colonna et al., Long-term safety and efficacy of amisulpride in subchronic or chronic schizophrenia, INT CLIN PS, 15(1), 2000, pp. 13-22
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
02681315 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
13 - 22
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-1315(200001)15:1<13:LSAEOA>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Amisulpride is an atypical antipsychotic with selective affinity for dopami ne D-2/D-3 receptors. In this long-term, open, randomised, multicentre tria l, patients with chronic or subchronic schizophrenia received amisulpride ( n = 370) or haloperidol (n = 118) for 12 months. Dosage regimens were flexi ble (amisulpride 200-800 mg/day, haloperidol 5-20 mg/day). Improvement in m ean Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total score was significantly greater fo r amisulpride than haloperidol (17.0 versus 12.8, P = 0.01). Positive sympt oms (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] positive) improved in a s imilar way in each group but amisulpride caused a significantly better impr ovement in negative symptoms (PANSS negative) (7.1 versus 3.7, P < 0.0001). Improvements in Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and Quality of Life Scale (QLS) scores were also significantly greater in the amisulpride grou p (GAF -20.1 versus -13.6, P = 0.001; QLS -0.64 versus -0.30, P = 0.02). Ad verse events were mainly psychiatric in nature, and occurred with similar f requency in each group (amisulpride 254/370, 69%; haloperidol 82/118, 70%). Extrapyramidal symptoms were more frequent for haloperidol (48/118, 41% ve rsus 96/370, 26% for amisulpride), leading to a greater requirement for ant iparkinsonian medication (haloperidol 66/118, 56% versus amisulpride 118/37 0, 32%). Haloperidol significantly aggravated parkinsonism, akathisia and i nvoluntary movement compared to amisulpride. The overall incidence of endoc rine events was comparable between groups (4% for amisulpride, 3% for halop eridol). Maintenance of efficacy was comparable in both treatment groups; 5 9% of amisulpride patients and 55% of haloperidol patients improved after 1 month of therapy remained improved throughout the study period. Amisulprid e is effective following flexible long-term administration and significantl y improves social functioning and quality of life. (C) 2000 Lippincott Will iams Br Wilkins.