Dissociation chemistry of the hydrogen-bridged radical cation [CH2=O center dot center dot center dot H center dot center dot center dot O=C-OCH3](center dot+): proton transport catalysis and charge transfer
Lm. Fell et al., Dissociation chemistry of the hydrogen-bridged radical cation [CH2=O center dot center dot center dot H center dot center dot center dot O=C-OCH3](center dot+): proton transport catalysis and charge transfer, INT J MASS, 196, 2000, pp. 85-99
Tandem mass spectrometry based experiments on the decarbonylation products
of ionized methyl-P-hydroxypyruvate (MHP) and dimethyloxalate (DMO) show th
at the hydrogen-bridged radical cation (HBRC) CH2=O...H...O=C-OCH3.+; is a
stable species in the gas phase. Its low energy dissociation products are p
rotonated methylformate, HOC(H)OCH:, and the formyl radical, HC=O-.. The HB
RC isomers HOCH2C(=O)OCH3.+ (ionized methylglycolate) and (CH3O)(2)C=O.+ (i
onized dimethylcarbonate) show the same dissociation characteristics. Deute
rium labeling experiments dictate that loss of HC=O-. from the title HBRC c
annot be formulated as a simple H shift from the formaldehyde moiety to the
C atom of the O=C-.-OCH3, group. Ab initio molecular orbital (MO) calculat
ions support the proposal that this dissociation proceeds via sequential tr
ansfers of a proton, electron, and another proton within ion-dipole complex
es. The first step in this rearrangement process is a 1,2-proton shift cata
lyzed by a formaldehyde dipole. This yields an ion/dipole complex, CH2=O H-
C(=O)OCH3+, that is in the correct configuration for electron transfer to o
ccur at the energetic threshold dictated by experiment. The resulting inter
mediate triggers the transfer of yet another proton from the formaldehyde u
nit, thereby generating another stable H-bridged radical cation viz. HC=O..
.H...OC(H)OCH3.+. This final intermediate dissociates with little or no act
ivation energy into HOC(H)OCH3+ and HC=O-.. It is further predicted by the
calculations that ionized methylglycolate isomerizes into the title HBRC by
a fairly high barrier that makes the communication between ionized methylg
lycolate and dimelhylcarbonate via the title ion quite unlikely; instead an
alternative route for this communication is proposed. (Int J h iass Spectr
om 195/196 (2000) 85-99) (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.