Purpose: To determine the optimal coplanar treatment technique for six-fiel
d conformal radiotherapy of prostate only (PO) or prostate plus seminal ves
icles (PSV).
Methods and Materials: A series of 6-MV six-field coplanar treatment plans
were created for PO and PSV volumes in 10 patients prescribed to both 64 an
d 74 Gy, All plans consisted of laterally-symmetric anterior oblique, later
al, and posterior oblique fields, The posterior oblique fields were varied
through 20-45 degrees relative to the lateral fields, and for each of these
angles, the anterior oblique fields were varied through 25-65 degrees rela
tive to lateral. The plans were compared by means of rectal volumes irradia
ted to 80% or more of the prescribed dose (V-80); normal tissue complicatio
n probability (NTCP) for rectum, bladder, and femoral heads; and tumor cont
rol probability (TCP), Femoral head tolerance was designated as 52 Gy to no
more than 10% volume.
Results: For the PO group, anterior oblique fields at 50 degrees from later
al and posterior oblique fields at 25 degrees from lateral produced the low
est V-80, together with femoral head doses which were appropriate for most
patients (V-80 = 24.4 +/- 5.3 % [1 SD]), Compared to a commonly-used six-fi
eld (reference) plan with both anterior and posterior oblique fields at 35
degrees from lateral (V-80 = 26.3 +/- 5.9%), this represented an improvemen
t (p = 0.001), For the PSV group, the optimal anterior and posterior obliqu
e fields were at 65 degrees and 30 degrees from lateral, respectively (V-80
47.5 +/- 6.3%), Relative to the reference plan (V-80 = 49.4 +/- 5.6%), thi
s was a marginal improvement (p = 0.07).
Conclusion: The optimized six-field plans provide increased rectal sparing
at both standard and escalated doses. Moreover, the gain in TCP resulting f
rom dose escalation can be achieved with a smaller increase in rectal NTCP
using the optimized six-field plans. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.