Pk. Hitchcott et Gd. Phillips, AMYGDALA AND HIPPOCAMPUS CONTROL DISSOCIABLE ASPECTS OF DRUG-ASSOCIATED CONDITIONED REWARDS, Psychopharmacology, 131(2), 1997, pp. 187-195
Limbic innervation of the nucleus accumbens via the ventral subiculum/
hippocampus and basolateral area of the amygdala has been shown to de
termine dissociable aspects of behaviour controlled by stimuli associa
ted with natural rewards. However, the respective contributions of the
ventral subiculum and amygdala to behaviour governed by drug-associat
ed stimuli remain to be determined. Experiments consisted of two phase
s: drug-stimulus training, and subsequent stimulus-only testing. Initi
al training sessions were of two alternating forms. During drug sessio
ns, responding upon one lever resulted in an infusion of 1 mu g d-amph
etamine into the nucleus accumbens, whilst during saline sessions d-am
phetamine was replaced with saline. Each infusion (drug or saline) was
preceded with either a light, or tone. Responding upon a control leve
r had no programmed consequences. Following training, the levers were
retracted, and instead two novel vertical bars were extended from the
chamber ceiling. Movement of one bar produced the drug-associated stim
ulus, whilst the alternative bar produced the saline-associated stimul
us. Infusions of the AMPA receptor antagonist CNQX into the ventral su
biculum or basolateral area of the amygdala (0, 0.2, 2.0 nmol) were ma
de immediately before the start of each session. Intra-basolateral are
a of the amygdala CNQX reduced responding upon the drug-associated sti
mulus bar, but at the same time increased responding upon the saline-a
ssociated stimulus bar. By contrast, intra-ventral subiculum CNQX redu
ced drug-associated stimulus responding selectively. Neither manipulat
ion affected levels of activity within the operant chamber extraneous
to the bar-pushing response. Hence, the basolateral area of the amygda
la appeared to have determined the degree of discriminative control ex
erted over behaviour by the drug-associated stimulus, whilst the ventr
al subiculum is suggested to have determined the efficacy of the condi
tioned reward.